surveypaper-drm-tee/main.tex

187 lines
4.5 KiB
TeX
Executable File

\documentclass[10pt,conference,twocolumn,final,a4paper]{IEEEtran}
\usepackage{ifluatex}
\ifluatex
\usepackage{fontspec}
\defaultfontfeatures{Ligatures=TeX} % To support LaTeX quoting style
%\setromanfont{Vollkorn}
\else
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\fi
\usepackage{clrscode}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage[]{graphicx}
\usepackage{acronym}
\newcommand{\documenttitle}{Here be dragons}
\newcommand{\abstracttext}{Abstract goes here}
% set pdf metadata
\usepackage[
pdftitle={\documenttitle},
pdfauthor={Oliver Schmidt},
breaklinks
]{hyperref}
%\usepackage{breakurl}
\newcommand{\comment}[1]{{\parindent0pt\fbox{\begin{minipage}{0.45\textwidth}{\em #1}\end{minipage}}}}
\newenvironment{changed}{\red}{\color{black}}
\newcommand{\todo}[1]{ \color{red} \footnote{ \color{red}[#1] \color{black}} \color{black}}
\newcommand{\Hide}[1]{%
{
\parindent0pt
\emph{\scriptsize #1}
}
}
%\renewcommand{\Hide}[1]{}
\pagenumbering{arabic}
\begin{document}
%----------------------------------------------------------------------
% Title Information, Abstract and Keywords
%----------------------------------------------------------------------
\title{\documenttitle}
% % %
% In case of double blind submissions:
%\author{
% \IEEEauthorblockN{Anonymous}
% \IEEEauthorblockA{Some Research Group\\
% Some Institution\\
% Some Email Addresses%
% }
%}
\author{
\IEEEauthorblockN{Oliver Schmidt}
\IEEEauthorblockA{TU Dresden\\
oliver.schmidt3$[$at$]$mailbox.tu-dresden.de%
}
}
\maketitle
% force pagenumbering
\thispagestyle{plain}
\pagestyle{plain}
% % %
% sources on writing papers:
% look for a /good/ outline at the end of this text, the /why/ is found at this link:
% http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/bundy/how-tos/writingGuide.html
% http://www-net.cs.umass.edu/kurose/writing/
% http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/etc/writing-style.html
% Read ``Zen - or the art of motorcycle maintenance'' to understand what science and research is
% Read ``The craft of research'' to /really/ learn how to conduct research and report about it! :-)
% some hints on plagiarism: http://www.williamstallings.com/Extras/Writing_Guide.html
% read the text above again. the most important part (that we all tend to forget) is only 5 paragraphs
\begin{abstract}
\abstracttext
\end{abstract}
\begin{IEEEkeywords}
% Are NOT: Peer-To-Peer, Anonymity, Privacy.
% BUT TAKEN FROM THIS LIST:
% http://www.ieee.org/organizations/pubs/ani_prod/keywrd98.txt
Security, DRM, Trusted Execution Environments, SGX,
\end{IEEEkeywords}
% }
\maketitle
\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle
\section{Introduction}
\IEEEPARstart{I}{n}
Motivation: DRM means/ meant lockdown: Bruce Schneier quote, War on General Computation (Cory Doctorow), examples for bad obfuscation DRM
% % %
% Literature Survey and Background
\section{Background}
\label{sec:background}
lockdown techniques: TPM, secure boot
TEEs: SGX, TrustZone
(InkTag?)
Android DRM, EME DRM arch, TBDRM (-> fTPM)
\section{lockdown/ openness}
What parts need to be locked down?
WiDevine/ Netflix ban from rooted devices
- remaining other problems: cultural heritage, inflexibility, tied to a certain technological platform
\section{Summary}
% % %
% Theory (probably)
\section{Glossary}
\label{sec:glossary}
\nobreak
\begin{acronym}[GN6ASL]
\input{glossary.tex}
\end{acronym}
%\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
%\bibliography{mybib}
%----------------------------------------------------------------------
\end{document}
% % %
% A good outline for a computer science paper (according to Al Bundy)
%
% Title
% * - ideally the title should state the hypothesis of the paper
%
% Abstract
% * - state hypothesis and summarise the evidence that supports or refutes it
%
% Introduction
% * - motivate the contribution!
%
% Literature Survey
% * - broad and shallow account of the field, rival approaches, drawbacks of each, major outstanding problems
%
% Background
% * - states previous work in more detail, where this is necessary for understanding
%
% Theory
% * - underlying theory, definitions, theorems etc.
%
% Specification
% * - requirements and specs of implementation
%
% Implementation Evaluation Related Work
% * - narrow but deep comparison with main rivals
%
% Further Work Conclusion
% * - summarise research, discuss significance, restate hypothesis and the evidence for and against it, - recapitulate original motivation, reassess the state of the field in the light of this new contribution
%
% Appendices
%