\documentclass[10pt,conference,twocolumn,final,a4paper]{IEEEtran} \usepackage{ifluatex} \ifluatex \usepackage{fontspec} \defaultfontfeatures{Ligatures=TeX} % To support LaTeX quoting style %\setromanfont{Vollkorn} \else \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \fi \usepackage{clrscode} \usepackage{xcolor} \usepackage[]{graphicx} \usepackage{acronym} \newcommand{\documenttitle}{Here be dragons} \newcommand{\abstracttext}{Abstract goes here} % set pdf metadata \usepackage[ pdftitle={\documenttitle}, pdfauthor={Oliver Schmidt}, breaklinks ]{hyperref} %\usepackage{breakurl} \newcommand{\comment}[1]{{\parindent0pt\fbox{\begin{minipage}{0.45\textwidth}{\em #1}\end{minipage}}}} \newenvironment{changed}{\red}{\color{black}} \newcommand{\todo}[1]{ \color{red} \footnote{ \color{red}[#1] \color{black}} \color{black}} \newcommand{\Hide}[1]{% { \parindent0pt \emph{\scriptsize #1} } } %\renewcommand{\Hide}[1]{} \pagenumbering{arabic} \begin{document} %---------------------------------------------------------------------- % Title Information, Abstract and Keywords %---------------------------------------------------------------------- \title{\documenttitle} % % % % In case of double blind submissions: %\author{ % \IEEEauthorblockN{Anonymous} % \IEEEauthorblockA{Some Research Group\\ % Some Institution\\ % Some Email Addresses% % } %} \author{ \IEEEauthorblockN{Oliver Schmidt} \IEEEauthorblockA{TU Dresden\\ oliver.schmidt3$[$at$]$mailbox.tu-dresden.de% } } \maketitle % force pagenumbering \thispagestyle{plain} \pagestyle{plain} % % % % sources on writing papers: % look for a /good/ outline at the end of this text, the /why/ is found at this link: % http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/bundy/how-tos/writingGuide.html % http://www-net.cs.umass.edu/kurose/writing/ % http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/etc/writing-style.html % Read ``Zen - or the art of motorcycle maintenance'' to understand what science and research is % Read ``The craft of research'' to /really/ learn how to conduct research and report about it! :-) % some hints on plagiarism: http://www.williamstallings.com/Extras/Writing_Guide.html % read the text above again. the most important part (that we all tend to forget) is only 5 paragraphs \begin{abstract} \abstracttext \end{abstract} \begin{IEEEkeywords} % Are NOT: Peer-To-Peer, Anonymity, Privacy. % BUT TAKEN FROM THIS LIST: % http://www.ieee.org/organizations/pubs/ani_prod/keywrd98.txt Security, DRM, Trusted Execution Environments, SGX, \end{IEEEkeywords} % } \maketitle \IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle \section{Introduction} \IEEEPARstart{I}{n} Motivation: DRM means/ meant lockdown: Bruce Schneier quote, War on General Computation (Cory Doctorow), examples for bad obfuscation DRM % % % % Literature Survey and Background \section{Background} \label{sec:background} lockdown techniques: TPM, secure boot TEEs: SGX, TrustZone (InkTag?) Android DRM, EME DRM arch, TBDRM (-> fTPM) \section{lockdown/ openness} What parts need to be locked down? WiDevine/ Netflix ban from rooted devices - remaining other problems: cultural heritage, inflexibility, tied to a certain technological platform \section{Summary} % % % % Theory (probably) \section{Glossary} \label{sec:glossary} \nobreak \begin{acronym}[GN6ASL] \input{glossary.tex} \end{acronym} %\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran} %\bibliography{mybib} %---------------------------------------------------------------------- \end{document} % % % % A good outline for a computer science paper (according to Al Bundy) % % Title % * - ideally the title should state the hypothesis of the paper % % Abstract % * - state hypothesis and summarise the evidence that supports or refutes it % % Introduction % * - motivate the contribution! % % Literature Survey % * - broad and shallow account of the field, rival approaches, drawbacks of each, major outstanding problems % % Background % * - states previous work in more detail, where this is necessary for understanding % % Theory % * - underlying theory, definitions, theorems etc. % % Specification % * - requirements and specs of implementation % % Implementation Evaluation Related Work % * - narrow but deep comparison with main rivals % % Further Work Conclusion % * - summarise research, discuss significance, restate hypothesis and the evidence for and against it, - recapitulate original motivation, reassess the state of the field in the light of this new contribution % % Appendices %